With over 30 years of Call to the Bar, more than a decade devoted exclusively to family law, and several successes on groundbreaking cases in BC, Lisa Newby is arguably one of the most prominent family lawyers in the province. Nowadays Lisa focuses on her work as a parenting coordinator, arbitrator, and mediator in family law.
Although Lisa became a lawyer in 1994, she spent 8 years as a stay-at-home mothers raising three children before returning to practice exclusively in family law in 2014. Being a mother and a family lawyer made her passionate about helping families move through some of life’s hardest moments with a sense of calmness and clarity. She’s worked in various legal areas, from criminal prosecutions to employment law and complex family disputes. Her in-depth experience lets her see the big picture while never losing sight of the people at the heart of it.
She focuses on resolving high-conflict parenting issues and high-net worth and highly complex financial issues in family law including trusts, corporations, multi-jurisdictional and tax issues.
She is most passionate about finding resolutions which she considers best achieved through parenting coordination, mediation and arbitration. These are areas she excels at and anyone using her as an ADR professional will be lucky to leverage her skills to find the right solution.
Lisa has been the successful counsel on numerous cases at the BC Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, some of which are as follows:
- Kwan v. Wong –successful counsel on proving her client’s asserted date of separation, which meant the spouse would not have any claims to numerous and significant assets.
- Johnson v. Johnson – successful counsel on having the court announce a marriage agreement binding and effective, included costs award in favour of Lisa’s client.
- Hanson v. Dinney – a rare decision in which the court allowed interim relocation of a child for Lisa’s client in addition to a costs award;
- Harms v. Harms (x2) – over $20,000,000 in assets, client won on every major argument including valuation, excluded property and a costs award.
- G.S.R. v. R.E.R. – successful counsel on resisting an interim application that sought shared usage of recreational property pending trial. Included costs award.